|
Op-Ed: How We Ended Welfare, Together
August 22, 2006
By Bill Clinton
New York Times
Ten years ago today I signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act. By then I had long been committed to welfare reform.
As a governor, I oversaw a workfare experiment in Arkansas in 1980 and
represented the National Governors Association in working with Congress
and the Reagan administration to draft the welfare reform bill enacted
in 1988.
Yet when I ran for president in 1992, our system still was not working
for the taxpayers or for those it was intended to help. In my first State
of the Union address, I promised to “end welfare as we know it,”
to make welfare a second |
Credit: Clinton Library
Signing the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation
Act of 1996 in the Rose Garden |
chance, not a way of life, exactly the change
most welfare recipients wanted it to be.
Most Democrats and Republicans wanted to pass welfare legislation shifting
the emphasis from dependence to empowerment. Because I had already given 45
states waivers to institute their own reform plans, we had a good idea of what
would work. Still, there were philosophical gaps to bridge. The Republicans
wanted to require able-bodied people to work, but were opposed to continuing
the federal guarantees of food and medical care to their children and to spending
enough on education, training, transportation and child care to enable people
to go to work in lower-wage jobs without hurting their children.
On Aug. 22, 1996, after vetoing two earlier versions, I signed welfare
reform into law. At the time, I was widely criticized by liberals who
thought the work requirements too harsh and conservatives who thought
the work incentives too generous. Three members of my administration ultimately
resigned in protest. Thankfully, a majority of both Democrats and Republicans
voted for the bill because they thought we shouldn't be satisfied with
a system that had led to intergenerational dependency.
The last 10 years have shown that we did in fact end welfare as we knew
it, creating a new beginning for millions of Americans.
|
|
In the past decade, welfare rolls have dropped substantially, from 12.2 million
in 1996 to 4.5 million today. At the same time, caseloads declined by 54 percent.
Sixty percent of mothers who left welfare found work, far surpassing predictions
of experts. Through the Welfare to Work Partnership, which my administration
started to speed the transition to employment, more than 20,000 businesses hired
1.1 million former welfare recipients. Welfare reform has proved a great success,
and I am grateful to the Democrats and Republicans who had the courage to work
together to take bold action.
The success of welfare reform was bolstered by other anti-poverty initiatives,
including the doubling of the earned-income tax credit in 1993 for lower-income
workers; the 1997 Balanced Budget Act, which included $3 billion to move long-term
welfare recipients and low-income, noncustodial fathers into jobs; the Access
to Jobs initiative, which helped communities create innovative transportation
services to enable former welfare recipients and other low-income workers to
get to their new jobs; and the welfare-to-work tax credit, which provided tax
incentives to encourage businesses to hire long-term welfare recipients.
I also signed into law the toughest child-support enforcement in history, doubling
collections; an increase in the minimum wage in 1997; a doubling of federal
financing for child care, helping parents look after 1.5 million children in
1998; and a near doubling of financing for Head Start programs.
The results: child poverty dropped to 16.2 percent in 2000, the lowest rate
since 1979, and in 2000, the percentage of Americans on welfare reached its
lowest level in four decades. Overall, 100 times as many people moved out of
poverty and into the middle class during our eight years as in the previous
12. Of course the booming economy helped, but the empowerment policies made
a big difference.
Regarding the politics of welfare reform, there is a great lesson to be learned,
particularly in today’s hyper-partisan environment, where the Republican
leadership forces bills through Congress without even a hint of bipartisanship.
Simply put, welfare reform worked because we all worked together. The 1996 Welfare
Act shows us how much we can achieve when both parties bring their best ideas
to the negotiating table and focus on doing what is best for the country.
The recent welfare reform amendments, largely Republican-only initiatives,
cut back on states’ ability to devise their own programs. They also disallowed
hours spent pursuing an education from counting against required weekly work
hours. I doubt they will have the positive impact of the original legislation.
We should address the inadequacies of the latest welfare reauthorization in
a bipartisan manner, by giving states the flexibility to consider higher education
as a category of “work,” and by doing more to help people get the
education they need and the jobs they deserve. And perhaps even more than additional
welfare reform, we need to raise the minimum wage, create more good jobs through
a commitment to a clean energy future and enact tax and other policies to support
families in work and child-rearing.
Ten years ago, neither side got exactly what it had hoped for. While we compromised
to reach an agreement, we never betrayed our principles and we passed a bill
that worked and stood the test of time. This style of cooperative governing
is anything but a sign of weakness. It is a measure of strength, deeply rooted
in our Constitution and history, and essential to the better future that all
Americans deserve, Republicans and Democrats alike.
© New York Times
| 
